Tag Archives: tedkennedy

Empty Senate Seats

This has been the year for under-representation in the US Senate.  As you may recall from your American history class, the legislative part of the United States government is made up of two house – the House of Representatives where the representation is dependent on state population and the Senate where representation is two per state.

Look at this particular year in the history of the Senate.

Al Franken (D-MN) and Norm Coleman (R-MN) were tied up in an extremely close election.  There were recounts and court appeals before, in April – four months after the Senate convened for its session, the winner was decided.  This decision was also appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court where, on June 30, 2009, Al Franken was declared the winner.  He was sworn in as a United States Senator on July 7, 2009.  The state of Minnesota spent six months being under-represented in the US Senate.

New York did not spend nearly that amount of time being underrepresented.  The junior US Senator from NY Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) was nominated by her former adversary to the position of Secretary of State.  The nomination came on December 1, 2008.  This would give, all would think, Governor David A Paterson (D-NY) plenty of time to decide on a successor as, according to NYS law, US Senate vacancies are by appointment of the governor.  On January 21, 2009, Hillary Rodham Clinton was confirmed by the US Senate as the 67th Secretary of State.  Member of Congress Kirsten Gillibrand was appointed to the Senate seat on January 23, 2009 and officially took the oath of office on January 27.  The state of NY was underrepresented for one month in the US Senate.

The Boston Globe is reporting today that US Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) is hoping to prevent any time of under-representation in the US Senate for his home state of Massachusetts.  Kennedy, who was diagnosed with a brain tumor over a year ago, has not been in Washington.  He has been keeping in touch with his colleague, Senator John Kerry (D-MA), and his staff in DC but has not been on the floor of the senate while an issue- health care reform - that has been central to his almost fifty year Senate career has evolved.  The letter, sent to Governor Deval L Patrick (D) and Massachusetts state senate president and house speaker, asks for a change in a 2004 state law that says US Senate vacancies are filled by special elections that must take place within five months.  Kennedy is asking both the legislature and the governor to consider changing this to allow for an appointment by the governor to fill gap between a vacancy and the special election and administering of the oath of office.

In the middle of a vital battle to reform health care in this country, Kennedy wants to be sure the opinions of Massachusetts residents are represented in the US Senate.  Whether this means Kennedy feels his own mortality and that death is close or whether it means he realizes he cannot continue in his position as a US Senator is inconsequential.  All states would do well to watch closely what Massachusetts does.  Ideally, in my mind, there would be one way – in all 50 states – to fill vacancies in the US Senate.  This method would allow for an appointment immediately and a special election to follow in a timely manner.  To have a state, in the legislative chamber that is suppose to contain equal representation for each state, underrepresented is down right unamerican.


Disappointing Democrats

Olympics… Political conventions… what more can I ask?

I should be in a literal heaven.  I have a strong love of the Olympics, made much stronger by working at the 1980 Winter Games in Lake Placid.  I am a political junkie and the next two weeks bring conventions that only come once every four years.  The only thing that would make life better would be that winter and summer Olympics were still in the same year.  Right?

Wrong.  The Olympics were great.  I watched a lot of them but the crap that the US networks pass off as coverage and “live” is annoying.  I realize that China is a 12 hour time difference but to have to cruise the four or five – I couldn’t really remember which of NBC’s channels were and were not showing coverage – to find coverage of the “non-ratings” sports is annoying.  The friends and family of that equestrian are as interested in seeing the event “live” as we all are of Michael Phelps.  I did enjoy my five day trip to Niagara Falls where I could watch coverage on CBC, actual coverage more of the time than interviews and “bits.”

I started to watch the Democratic convention on three 24 hour networks last evening.  CNN – which tends to be on at my house during the day as background noise – was saying Jimmy Carter was speaking before Caroline Kennedy and the tribute to her uncle.  I am a huge Jimmy Carter fan.  No, I never voted for him.  I just am a huge fan.  I was deeply disappointed when  Carter did not actually speak.  CNN had said it would be approximately 8:35 pm, after Nancy Pelosi.  Well, CNN is broadcasting from the floor of the convention and talked right through Pelosi.  MSNBC did air her comments live.  CNN also talked straight through the “tribute” to Jimmy Carter, which was really a very long endorsement/commercial for Barack Obama.  I know that is what the convention is truly about – the anointing of the new chosen one – but this is not what was billed.  After the pre-recorded bit, Carter and his wife Roslyn walked out on stage to applause but no speaking at all.

The Ted Kennedy tribute did not disappoint.  This is mostly because the man could actually speak.  I know he wasn’t scheduled to necessarily but he did.  He also, for a 76 year old who is undergoing stringent medical treatment for brain cancer/tumor, looked pretty darn good.  Caroline Kennedy – you would realize that only Fox News reported her as Kennedy Schlossberg which is what she has always been up until now – looked like she was ready – if she lived in Massachusetts still – to step right into the family shoes when Uncle Teddy decides to step down.  Being a good political operative, when asked earlier in the day if she had ruled out politics, she didn’t give a straight answer.

By the time the keynote was to start – Michelle Obama, I was ready to go to bed.  I realize that there is a nation on different time zones.  I tried to stay focused.  But by 10 pm – and I am not sure exactly when she started – I was watching local news and re-runs of Sex and the City.  Even finding out what the possible first lady was wearing was not enough to keep me interested.  I caught, during commercials, bits and pieces of her speech.  She is a good orator.  I wondered – as did many pundits this morning – if maybe the country was backing the wrong Obama.  She delivered what her husband needed. 

My problem is that a man who people want to be president needed to ask his wife to make him more “down to earth.”  If he can’t do that on his own – and I do not think he can, is he really the candidate we want?

Maybe tonight will be a better night at the convention.  I have not totally given up on it but will tell you all … After last night, I am seriously thinking college football on Thursday night, not Obama’s convention speech.


Kennedy Endorses Obama

I cannot believe that I was the only one watching Senator Ted Kennedy today as he endorsed Barrack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination who was thinking of the irony in what Kennedy had to say.  I was trying so hard not to laugh at the words Kennedy was professing that I had a stomach ache when I was done.

First, it is Ted Kennedy.  The man was first elected to the United States Senate when I was one year old.  Granted, I stuffed envelopes as a 12 year old for George McGovern, but I have only been able to vote for a little under 30 years.  Senator Kennedy is a Washington fixture.  He has history there.  There is probably not a Democrat that is more in the Washington circle than Ted Kennedy.

Second, it is Ted Kennedy talking about change.  I don’t know that Ted Kennedy has ever thought about change.  Yes, he did back civil rights in the 60′s but was there a democrat who didn’t?  He is more about business as usual, than change.  The irony keeps coming.

Third, do you not find it ironic that a man who has worked in the US Senate for 42 years thinks the people – the majority of whom have not yet voted in the presidential primaries – cannot decide for themselves who to vote for?  This is definitely a political thought.  He knows better than you or I and wants to be sure we know it to.

I fully support Ted Kennedy – as well as any other registered voter in the United States – to pick who he wishes to support for president.  I do not want to know why he thinks the rest of need to know what he thinks months before the convention, at least a week before the largest primary day on the calendar.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,870 other followers