Tag Archives: ncaa

Cornell Hockey

Last week, my daughter and I picked up a former classmate of hers from university and made what seems to be our annual trek to Cornell University. We live about 40 miles from Ithaca, New York and Cornell is an easy drive for a game or event, providing weather cooperates.

The reason for the trip this time was the Niagara University men’s ice hockey team was going to be playing Cornell. The 7 pm start made it easy to get her friend from college and get to Lynah Rink with time to spare. I will say I have never before had to park in the garage for a hockey, soccer or basketball game at Cornell but, even with the Thanksgiving break beginning, the parking lots around the rink were full.

Lynah and Cornell have some great hockey traditions. The banners that hang from the rafters tell the story of a program that wins and produces championships. Games are very hard to get tickets for, between the student section – which was full last week despite the impending break – and the season ticket holders. While there were seats in the area of the season ticket holders that looked empty, those seats most likely belonged to someone who was out of town for the holiday.

We saw some great hockey played by both teams. Niagara, who is not having a great season as far as wins, played very well and almost took the game to overtime. Unfortunately, a goal went in for Cornell with approximately 8 minutes left in the third period.

Enjoy the slideshow of sights from the game. Please realize the red you will see is mostly on the fans as I was looking to get good shots of Niagara players. Also realize that all photos were taken through glass. While our seats were practically on the ice, section O – where Cornell puts visiting fans – is not conducive to great photos of the entire ice.

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.


NCAA Sports

I have written about collegiate sports on many occasions.  This particular occasion comes to you via an ad that the NCAA is running during the current basketball tournament.  I have to write about something having to do with the Madness and my bracket is not the thing as it is dismal after two days of play.

People frequently will be heard complaining about the cost of tickets to this sporting event or that sporting event.  I do it myself sometimes.  I have never complained about admission prices for a college game, though.  Sometimes, it is expensive for college sports but most times, it is barely enough to cover upkeep of fields, rinks and courts.  I thought, and now I have seen the ad below several times, the NCAA had hit the nail on the head the first time I saw the ad below.  It gets across the point that the monies collected through broadcast rights do not just sit in some big organization.

To see more about my NCAA rantings and ravings, check out the links below.

Division One Downfall

Holy Hockey, Batman!

Academics, Athletics and the University

NCAA Recruiting Rules Change

Facebook, MySpace and the College Athlete

Road Trip Coming

“A Matter of Class”

Teen Identity


Academics, Athletics and the University

Seems that there is a constant discussion in my area regarding the local university, its ladder to division one collegiate sports and putting academics on the back burner.  This discussion took on a national slant when “Outside the Lines” on ESPN had on Pete Thamel of The NY Times, Dr Joel Thier who is AD at Binghamton University and Tom Brennan who is a former America East coach at Vermont.

 

A week or so ago, The NY Times writer Pete Thamel did an article on the change in attitude at Binghamton University.  The gist of the article is that Binghamton has sacrificed academics – as a research university, academics is suppose to be first and foremost – for the dream of Division 1 sports.

 

Do I think that some academic standing has been sacrificed at Binghamton University?  Of course.  Do I think this shift in attitude is solely in the basketball program?  Of course not.  Do I think that there should be an investigation into this issue at Binghamton?  Of course not.

 

Athletics and academics, especially in highly visible sports or those that may be turning a profit, seldom mix well.  Athletes, sometimes encouraged by their coach and other times all on their own, feel they are entitled to special treatment by professors.  This is particular noticeable in sports that cover both fall and spring semesters like basketball.  There is no semester where these student-athletes can take the “hard” courses needed for their majors.  There is no down semester.

 

Binghamton University is not alone in thinking that athletes can maintain the same academic schedule that non-atheletes can.  The problem is that this is seldom true.  When you allow “special talent” admissions to strengthen your athletic program, you may be causing an issue for the student-athlete.  There is a reason most universities and colleges have admission requirements.  Bypassing these requirements means that the student may not have the ability to do the course work required at that specific university.

 

The reason I don’t believe that an investigation should be launched is because this is not a Binghamton only problem.  This is an issue at all colleges and universities from junior colleges to division three and up.  I have seen this in play since the early 80′s when I worked my way through college as a tutor for the athletic department.  It happens when Cortland and Brockport let in a student who would not otherwise be admitted so that student can join the football or soccer team.  This is not a Binghamton problem.  This is a college/university athletics problem.  If you want a winning team, your institution will sacrifice academics.


NCAA Recruiting Rules Change

Surprise!  Surprise!

The NCAA thinks it is just like big time professional sports and has an annual meeting to discuss rules and changes to said rules.  If you have ever gone through the NCAA recruiting manual, I am amazed there are not more violations.  It is like reading a state report but much more dry and hard to figure out.

The big change this year involves men’s basketball and recruiting.  Why men’s basketball was singled out is beyond me but it was.  You are now considered a recruit as young as seventh grade in men’s basketball.  Why, you may ask?  The reasoning stated is that a lot of college coaches run clinics and summer camps aimed at this age level.  To give everyone a level playing field, the new rule as to the age of a prospect has been set up.

What is my biggest problem with this new rule?  Well, we can start off with it being hard for parents of juniors and seniors in high school to keep up with what is needed for NCAA recruiting and eligibility.  It is harder for student-athletes and potential recruits to keep up on what is needed by the NCAA.  It is also expensive to keep up on what is needed as there is a filing fee for eligibility clearance for division 1 and division 2 schools.  There is no longer a need for this clearinghouse filing for division 3 schools.

Another reason I find this a ridiculous new rule is that it only applies to one sport.  Within that sport, it only applies to the male portion of it.  That is hugely discriminatory.  If I were a men’s basketball coach, I would be screaming.  Set the rule and make everyone play by it or do not make the rule at all.

The logic behind it that coaches run clinics and camps is true.  It is not just men’s basketball coaches that do this though.  It is soccer coaches, hockey coaches, lacrosse coaches, football coaches.  You need to apply the rule to male and female sports.  You need to apply the rule to all sports, not just basketball.

Heaven help that parent whose son is 12 and in 7th grade and extremely good at basketball.  His chances of being seen by a coach who will follow him until he is starting to look at colleges has just decreased.  His chances of going to a clinic or camp where a real, live college coach will help improve his skills has just decreased.


Facebook, MySpace and the College Athlete

I am not a huge fan of Facebook or MySpace but I do have profiles on both.  I don’t sit and regularly check them as my teenagers do.  I do regularly check my teenagers’ profiles, though.  The problem is a lot of teenagers and early 20s kids don’t get that people other than your “friends” check your “life in cyberspace.”

The most recent problem is in Texas.  Mack Brown has removed a lineman from his team – not just for a game but for good.  The reason for Buck Burnette’s name no longer appearing on the Texas Longhorn roster – racial remarks towards President-elect Obama on his Facebook page.

When my youngest daughter left for Division I soccer pre-season a few years back, I remember her telling me that the coach had warned the girls at orientation to not post any pictures of under-age drinking on their MySpace or Facebook pages.  A lacrosse player had some pretty interesting drinking pics on one of her pages the year before.  She was no longer at the college or maybe it was that she was no longer playing lacrosse.  The point was, the coach had found out about this one player, along with teammates, breaking team rules via the internet.

Now, a scholarship and possibly – quite a few of Texas’s college players go on to play in the NFL – a future career have been ended.  First, the statement – which is no longer available along with the Facebook page – was ignorant.  It may or may not have been something the poster agreed with but just passing it on was not a smart move.  Second, I am pretty certain that the team was told that pages such as these would be checked.  Very few coaches check these things without telling the team first.

What do you think?  Did Mack Brown do what was right?  Did he overstep?  Do you think the NCAA should step in and make “no personal pages of any kind” a rule?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,870 other followers