Tag Archives: kirstengillibrand

Empty Senate Seats

This has been the year for under-representation in the US Senate.  As you may recall from your American history class, the legislative part of the United States government is made up of two house – the House of Representatives where the representation is dependent on state population and the Senate where representation is two per state.

Look at this particular year in the history of the Senate.

Al Franken (D-MN) and Norm Coleman (R-MN) were tied up in an extremely close election.  There were recounts and court appeals before, in April – four months after the Senate convened for its session, the winner was decided.  This decision was also appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court where, on June 30, 2009, Al Franken was declared the winner.  He was sworn in as a United States Senator on July 7, 2009.  The state of Minnesota spent six months being under-represented in the US Senate.

New York did not spend nearly that amount of time being underrepresented.  The junior US Senator from NY Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) was nominated by her former adversary to the position of Secretary of State.  The nomination came on December 1, 2008.  This would give, all would think, Governor David A Paterson (D-NY) plenty of time to decide on a successor as, according to NYS law, US Senate vacancies are by appointment of the governor.  On January 21, 2009, Hillary Rodham Clinton was confirmed by the US Senate as the 67th Secretary of State.  Member of Congress Kirsten Gillibrand was appointed to the Senate seat on January 23, 2009 and officially took the oath of office on January 27.  The state of NY was underrepresented for one month in the US Senate.

The Boston Globe is reporting today that US Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) is hoping to prevent any time of under-representation in the US Senate for his home state of Massachusetts.  Kennedy, who was diagnosed with a brain tumor over a year ago, has not been in Washington.  He has been keeping in touch with his colleague, Senator John Kerry (D-MA), and his staff in DC but has not been on the floor of the senate while an issue- health care reform - that has been central to his almost fifty year Senate career has evolved.  The letter, sent to Governor Deval L Patrick (D) and Massachusetts state senate president and house speaker, asks for a change in a 2004 state law that says US Senate vacancies are filled by special elections that must take place within five months.  Kennedy is asking both the legislature and the governor to consider changing this to allow for an appointment by the governor to fill gap between a vacancy and the special election and administering of the oath of office.

In the middle of a vital battle to reform health care in this country, Kennedy wants to be sure the opinions of Massachusetts residents are represented in the US Senate.  Whether this means Kennedy feels his own mortality and that death is close or whether it means he realizes he cannot continue in his position as a US Senator is inconsequential.  All states would do well to watch closely what Massachusetts does.  Ideally, in my mind, there would be one way – in all 50 states – to fill vacancies in the US Senate.  This method would allow for an appointment immediately and a special election to follow in a timely manner.  To have a state, in the legislative chamber that is suppose to contain equal representation for each state, underrepresented is down right unamerican.


Obama’s Possible Army Secretary

Many of my diehard Republican friends were very disappointed with the results of last November’s election.  They were, though, happy to hear that President Obama would keep Secretary Gates on as Secretary of Defense.  Now, Obama is busy filling those “lesser” positions.

The most recent rumor – being reported by NPR here – is that Obama may possibly name Congressman John McHugh as Secretary of the Army.  Why does this surprise anyone?  This type of an appointment is political strategy at its best.  New York’s congressional delegation has only three Republicans in it.  McHugh, one of those three, was re-elected in November with over 65% of the vote in his upstate district.  He has been in the House of Representatives for 17 years and is the ranking member on the Armed Services committee.

So, why is this strategic?  First, Obama is banking on being able to get a Democrat elected to replace McHugh in a special election for the NY-23rd.  The NY-23rd is a huge district, covering most of upstate NY and being over 14,000 square miles in size.  Obama has already proven that he can get Democrats elected in NYS by helping virtual unknown Scott Murphy to win a special election for the congressional seat vacated by Kirsten Gillibrand upon her appointment to the US Senate.

By chipping away at the three GOP members in the NY congressional delegation, Obama will create a force to be reckoned with within NYS, possibly strengthening the chances of a democratic governor being elected in 2010.  The current Democrat in the governor’s office – David Paterson – was not elected but took over from Eliot Spitzer in March of 2008 and has an extremely low approval rating with NYS voters.


NYS’s 20th Congressional District

As the new Congress began its work in January, the people of Minnesota were lacking representation.  The election for US Senator between former comedian Al Franken and sitting Senator Norm Coleman was too close to call.   There were recounts and lawsuits.  Now, 154 days after the election, Franken is up by 302 votes but has still not been officially seated.

 

The NYS 20th Congressional district is looking to be a similar issue.  The seat was left vacant when Governor David Paterson appointed then-Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand to the vacant US Senate seat that had belonged to now Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.  The election between political newcomer Democrat Scott Murphy and long-time state Assemblyman Republican Jim Tedisco was intense and heavily funded by national congressional campaign monies.  A congressional seat that would normally not even be looked at by other New Yorkers was the center of national news as it played out as a test of the Obama coattails.

 

The votes are counted.  After the special election on March 31st, the tally seesawed with about one hundred votes being the largest difference.  One day Murphy would be in the lead, one day Tedisco.  Then, the absentee ballots started to be counted.  All are counted now and Murphy is ahead of Tedisco by 273 votes.  

 

Unfortunately, over 1300 votes have been set aside from objections from one side or the other so the election is heading to the courts.  One such ballot is that of now US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.  GOP have said her absentee ballot should be considered null and void due to the fact she was in the district on the day of the election and should have voted at her polling location.  Today, attorneys from both sides will argue over these 1300 approximate ballots.

 

The bigger question is does a close election, won by just 273 votes, show that maybe the Democratic administration does not have the “mandate” from the voters that it claims the November election was?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,870 other followers