Tag Archives: gop

Mr. Gingrich

What makes Newt Gingrich electable? While Mr. Gingrich is known, and has proven that he still is, as a great debater, being able to deflect rhetoric and talk in a controlled environment does not indicate someone who is able to govern a country. Gingrich would respond with the fact that he did govern when he was in Congress. I will not deny that but also know that one of the most charismatic presidents in recent history was in the White House at the same time, meaning that governing was not all on the House.

In South Carolina, only one state I know, Mr. Gingrich took an overwhelming victory in the GOP primary. Surprisingly, he won over almost all different categories of voters, including evangelicals. These would be Christians. Yet, Gingrich has been married three times and divorced twice. He has admitted to having an extra-marital affair with Mrs. Gingrich Number 3 while still being married to Mrs. Gingrich Number 2. This is adultery and not something most Christians believe in or tolerate. I do believe Mr. Gingrich when he says he has sought forgiveness on the wrongs he has done. I do believe in second chances. I do believe in private matters – politician or not. I also believe that some private matters shed light on character.

My guess is that a lot of voters believe that a debate will decide who wins the White House in November. Since no one party holds a majority of the voters or voters do not always vote along party lines, both President Obama and the GOP nominee – whomever that may be – need to be able to appeal to the independents and to the other party. I am a Christian, though not an evangelical. I am a woman. I have followed politics since I was 12. I am registered in a political party – meaning I am not an independent – though I have only twice, since I have been able to vote for president, voted for a nominee of one of the two major parties.

What do all of these statements mean? One, both Obama and the Republican nominee had best hope that a viable third party candidate does not appear. Two, whoever wins will have to have more than a good debate. Three, the ability to appeal to both independents and those who are not in “your” party will play the most decisive part in who will win come November.

Do you follow politics? Do you only follow once it is a general election? Do you vote on party lines?


2012 GOP Primary

I have been watching the GOP presidential primaries and caucuses with interest. I am not a registered Republican. I do find the primary/caucus/nomination process amazing, though. I am particularly interested in this year’s GOP as there is an incumbent president of the opposing party who is running for reelection.

I realize that as a country we encourage anyone to run for elected office. Each state has its own threshold for getting a name on the ballot for the primary or caucus that is held in that state. While some of these hoops that need to be jumped through are high, most are reachable with a small organization.

What amazes me – particularly with the GOP the last two election cycles – is the massive number of initial candidates! Is it really necessary to have 8 to 12 choices? Can there possibly be that many varying views within the party. On top of that, can it possibly be good for the general election to have your candidates dragged through the mud by their own peers prior to that time?

I realize this process is not solely the property of the GOP. This particular election cycle, though, it is and it seems worse than in previous years. While there are not 12 GOP members trying to run the gamut of primaries and caucuses, the negativity started with Iowa – which started earlier than previous years due to wanting to be first. To the only slightly trained political eye that is mine, it seemed that the GOP had decided who was going to win the primaries and caucuses to become the party’s nominee before the actual voting began. Due to this unspoken nominee, the negativity came out first thing. Rather than waiting and letting the opposing party vet the negativity on the nominee, the other, non-ordained GOP candidates seem to be doing the Democrats’ jobs of picking apart each of the possibilities, including those who have little chance of being the party’s nominee.

Does the primary/caucus process seem more negative this year, already? Do you even pay attention prior to the general election cycle?


Political Madness

I use to write blog entries about March Madness having nothing to do with collegiate basketball.  That was way back when my daughter was playing Region 1 soccer and March meant the start of a travel season that easily saw our team traveling about 1000 miles one way to games.

 

I was thrilled today to see that Ken Rudin is giving us political junkies our own version of March Madness.  Not that I haven’t filled out a bracket or five – all with the same results which I know defeats the purpose – but this is a bracket that I can get into.  It is March Madness as only NPR can do it – the 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries.

 

So suck up the fact that your upset in the Big Dance didn’t happen today when Butler fell to LSU.  Don’t worry if your bracket has Northern Iowa going all the way.  Click over to NPR and fill out a totally different bracket here.


RNC Final Night

People – mostly the news media – were concerned when the Republican National Convention was trying to get started.  It was going to literally rain on their parade.  Natural disasters do not consult with political parties for a convenient time to occur.  The GOP did what was needed – curtailing events on their opening night, thereby showing us that a four day convention is not necessarily necessary, and helping to raise relief monies and supplies for those affected.

The final night of the convention, as with all political conventions, is meant as the crescendo, the peak – the speech by the top of the ticket.  Before I get to thoughts on that, I have to say that I was once again deeply disappointed by coverage on the 24 hours cable news networks.  I realize they pay people to comment on what is going on at these political events but they also exerted their “ideas” of what was newsworthy and what was not to have their commentators talk over speakers.  Let us listen to the event and then we, as voters and Americans, can decide if we should have listened or not, if it was worth our time.

I am glad that most of both conventions were done without the distraction of having my kids in school.  I missed part of last night’s chosen coverage due to getting kids settled into a schedule of homework – yes, there was homework on this night – and other school-related life events.  Still, to the best of my knowledge, actual CNN speaker coverage started with Marcia Blackburn – US Senator from Tennessee.  I know that Tim Pawlenty – short listed for VP and governor of the hosting state, Minnesota – spoke but I did not see this speech or have the ability to flip to find a channel that was carrying it.

I started watching in earnest with the introduction of Mary Fallin, Congresswoman from Oklahoma who was the lieutenant governor in 1995 when the bombing of the Federal Building took place.  Fallin spoke of how Oklahoma and the country rallied after that domestic terror happening.  She introduced a video that would quickly become controversial.  While she spoke, the huge video screen showed signs of the bombing in OKC, the search, rescue and recovery efforts, and the memorial that is now in OKC. 

When Fallin was finished speaking, Robert Davi narrated a video entitled “World Stood Still.”  The video was about terrorism and attacks on the US people both home and abroad.  It started with images of the Tehran hostages that doomed Jimmy Carter’s presidency.  It should images of Beirut, the USS Cole and then, concentrated on the September 11th attacks here at home.  The footage was graphic, undoubtedly.  The footage was not, in my mind, offensive in any manner.  The response to the video by commentators ranged from absolute anger from Keith Olbermann on MSNBC.  I caught his apologizing for airing it and saying that it was unthought of that the GOP would envoke the dead and the pain from 9/11 to gain votes.  CNN aired a more thoughtful, though time-consuming so additional speakers were not shown, discussion of the video.  Jeffery Toobin felt the video was entirely appropriate.  On the other hand, Paul Begala felt the video was on public policy but the fact that President Bush ignored warnings and could have prevented the happening and now the GOP is trying to get votes is appalling. 

The video was not as disturbing as other things I have seen or heard at the GOP convention.  I do agree with David Gergen that the GOP seems to have selective amnesia – a disorder normally experienced by teenagers – as they are trying to spin everything to their advantage and distance themselves from a sitting president.  Following Fallin’s discussion of the OKC bombings, the video was a perfect fit for a convention that is trying to show the American people that the GOP will be a better fit on the issue of national security.

Lindsey Graham, sitting US Senator from South Carolina, spoke on winning the war.  He discussed the milestones that have been met in Iraq.  He discussed where Iraq and the US and the Middle East would be if John McCain had not stood up and convinced Joe Lieberman to vote for the surge.  He indicated that Barack Obama’s campaign is built around losing in Iraq and pointed out that Obama let 2 1/2 years lapse between visits to Iraq.  While there, Obama never once met with General Petraeus.

When Graham finished with a bit on the VP candidate Sarah Palin, the GOP showed a video on Palin.  The video was meant to air prior to her speech on Wednesday night but time prevented it.

Tom Ridge, former Secretary of Homeland Security and former governor of Pennsylvania, spoke next.  He talked a lot about his friend John McCain.  As a matter of fact, a lot of the convention seemed to be spent talking about the person John McCain.  I am not sure that was necessary as I think most of the US – although, maybe it is just the red US – knows who John McCain is.  Ridge made some valid points.  He said that we run to win but win to govern.  He also said that the campaign is not about who can take a 3 am call – a veiled, or not so veiled, reference to a commercial Hillary Clinton ran against Barack Obama during the primaries – but abut who has answered the call all of his life.  He concluded with a quote-worthy statement, “the challenge of this time is not just to change.  The challenge of our time is to leave nothing to chance.”  That is an outlook I had not really thought about before.  Change is important but Ridge is truly correct in that we cannot leave anything to chance in these times.

Cindy McCain nominated and introduced her husband.  She came on stage with the children in the McCain family.  This was a nice contrast – introducing the family while they were next to her as opposed to them being in seats.  I am not sure why she spoke so long.  I tuned out.  I am not saying that what she was saying was unimportant.  A lot of it seemed to be redundant.  On top of that, a woman who is worth the amount of money she is standing on the national stage trying to make herself out to be just like you and me was too funny to keep watching.

John McCain took the stage under one spotlight.  As the podium rose to its pre-determined height, McCain smiled and waved and, unamplified, thanked the crowd.  He took a few minutes to discuss his background before taking a tack not seen earlier in the GOP convention.  Many speakers had given McCain’s opponent his due for making history.  McCain went further, saying he has respect and admiration for Obama and that they have more in common than different.  

There were some disruptions – protesters within the Xcel Center itself, as opposed to the protesting that has been going on outside.  McCain handled it on his feet with a quip of ”Please don’t be diverted by the gound noise and static.”

To stress his maverick and “watchdog” – my apologies to those who feel this is misused – style, McCain said, to thunderous applause, that he would veto the first big earmark bill that comes over his desk.  He would veto it and you – as in us, the American public – would know whose name(s) was on it. 

McCain stressed that it matters less that you fight than it does what you fight for.  He, then, took a cue from many politicians and started naming specific Americans he was fighting for – a family from Michigan, a family from Pennsylvania, a family from New Hampshire.

This discussion led into telling all listening that the GOP had lost the trust of the American people, that GOP had gone to Washington and let Washington change them.  This will not be the case in a McCain administration.

The speech was long.  It couldn’t, through no fault of McCain’s but due to personal issues here at home, hold my attention.  As I read over the later parts of the speech which I didn’t hear, McCain seemed to touch on a lot of issues.  There were not specifics – how parents can help turn around a failing school or get their children out of a failing school – but there were overviews of policy issues.

All in all, this convention did for the GOP what Denver did for the Democrats.  The GOP is energized and believes they can win the election.  That, other than trying to get the “word” out to others, is what a convention is about.  The GOP has done that.  Now, the real fight begins.  When November 5th dawns – or after the electoral college meets in December, the bigger question is can whoever wins actually pull the country together.


RNC Night Two

I actually had to head out for a run – I actually walked the whole 3.5 miles as I twisted a muscle in my back yesterday morning – early so that I could manage to be showered and planted in front of the television for the RNC.

The video productions were unbelievable.  Robert Duvall’s narration of a call to service was beautiful.  It truly could have been played at any convention.  It did not have to be a “republican” item.

I was also impressed that there was a contest held to see who would lead the convention in the Pledge of Allegiance on this night.  The 15 year old Roseville, Minnesota girl’s essay was set to a montage of photos fading in and out.  Victoria Blackstone did a wonderful job in leading the Pledge and a fantastic job in her essay that won the Stars and Stripes Essay Contest.

The entertainment is not what most would call mainstream, unless you like Christian rock.  Rachel Lampa sang two touching Christian songs.  I happen to enjoy Christian music, along with other types, and enjoyed her performance. 

My biggest complaint is again television coverage.  Some of the 24 hour cable news networks felt it was more important to show and not talk over both of Lampa’s songs.  Then, they immediately talked over the video piece on the McCain’s adoption of a child from a Bangladesh orphanage – more than willing to admit this may not be where the orphanage is as no one covered this part of the evening.  If I were trying to prioritize which is newsworthy, I would talk over the singing and play/televise/show the video which deals with the candidate.

The convention did a wonderful job of pointing out those in attendance that have served our country.  These people were former POWs, Medal of Honor recipients, former President George HW Bush. 

Laura Bush introduced the satellite feed speech of her husband, President George W Bush.  She played the role of cheerleader.  She whipped the crowd up into a frenzy as she gave an overview of the administration’s accomplishments.

If you have ever read my blog before, you will realize I am not a big fan of GW Bush’s public speaking abilities.  I truly believe, while not necessarily agreeing with everything he said, that this may have been his best presentation of a speech in eight years.  The one line that will probably be replayed again and again is his line that if the Hanoi Hilton – I am amazed the Hilton family hasn’t sued someone for that term – didn’t break John McCain’s loyalty to country, the angry left won’t.

After Bush’s short address, his wife came back to the podium to basically give us an overview of Cindy McCain.  She went over the humanitarian efforts of the possible first lady over the last eight months, ending with imagine what a someone like that can do in four years.

For a convention that has been on and off as the wind literally blows, last night was orchestrated beyond belief.  Speech after speech flowed into video into another speaker.  Once the “highlights” of the night began, there was little time for commentary until Senator Joe Lieberman left the podium.  I am sure this drove at least one network nuts as they couldn’t comment after each individual person.

Fred Thompson, Hollywood actor and former Tennessee senator, started his speech which was entitled “The Courage and Service of John McCain.”  There were parts of McCain’s life’s story that made me cringe.  I have vivid memories of Vietnam, of the divisiveness of that conflict, and of the real physical and mental injuries endured by those who served there.  I am not a big Vietnam war movie fan, avoiding most of them.  Thompson could have been pitching a script to a blockbuster at one point in his speech and I was tempted to turn the television off.

Prior to the discussion of McCain’s military service, Thompson did a quick overview of the ticket.  He blasted those who are upset that Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska, has not ever made the Washington talk show and cocktail circuits.  Probably his best line about the ticket was that when Sarah Palin and John McCain get to Washington, they are not going to care about how much those alligators are going to get aggitated, they are gonna drain that swamp.

Three things that Thompson said, after discussing John McCain’s service to his country, that stuck with me were first, that being a POW does not qualify anyone to be President of the United States.  It does show a person’s character and that DOES qualify some to be president.  Thompson also made sure that all listening know that there are two questions that will never need to be asked of John McCain:

  • “Who is this man?”
  • “Can we trust this man with the presidency?”

Next came the GOP’s own version of history.  Senator Joe Lieberman, Independent from Connecticut who was the 2000 Democratic vice presidential candidate, spoke to the convention.  This speech was more than worth waiting up for, not because of content but because of history.

Lieberman started his speech, which was entitled “The Original Maverick McCain,” by paraphrasing our country’s first president.  George Washington, I believe it was on leaving office at the end of his term, said that spirit of party is the greatest threat to our democracy.  Lieberman stated bluntly that country is more important than party and that is why he stood before the GOP convention.

Lieberman went over McCain’s record as a reformer in Washington.  He also wholeheartedly endorsed Sarah Palin – which really got the pundits talking afterwards.  It was not until later that it was discovered that Lieberman had spoken at length with Palin about her credentials and about what running for vice president is like.

Some of the most likely to be repeated Lieberman lines are:

  • “If John McCain is just another partisan Republican, I am Michael Moore’s favorite Democrat.”
  • “What America needs now is not more party unity but more national unity.”

Lieberman concluded with this final endorsement of his friend John McCain.  He will be a president our allies will trust and our enemies will fear.


Leaks Abound

I was, until now an hour and half prior to the actual announcement, becoming more and more impressed with the GOP operation.  I could not believe that the McCain vice presidential choice had not leaked yet.  I was amazed at the efforts the campaign was going to in covering up who the final choice was. 

All types of GOP stalwarts spent the week cancelling plans and flying into Dayton, Ohio.  Now, it has leaked.

Sarah Palin, former mayor of Wasilla, Alaska and sitting governor of the state of Alaska, is going to be the vice presidential nominee for the GOP.


Political Musings

I must be psychic.  Just this morning I was thinking I should be – instead of blogging about my youngest child going south for the weekend - blogging about my thoughts on which party is going to get wise first.  I truly believe this is going to be the telltale sign of who will end up winning the general election in November.

The infighting and sniping at each other has become continuous in both the democratic and the republican primaries now that both are down to two people.  The democrats, as the race seems so much closer by the numbers, are getting nastier quicker but the republicans – and that should be read the frontrunner, John McCain, as Mike Huckabee seems to be running a fairly clean campaign – are also getting in on it.

Does either party not realize this is not what voters want?  I don’t think the voters mind a candidate – even one extremely behind like Huckabee – appealing a primary result when there may have been some irregularities.  I do think that voters mind the constant personal picking that goes on between those whose policies are close to the same so there is little to differentiate between them.

It currently looks like the GOP is going to pull it together.  Mitt Romney is going to endorse John McCain.  He is going to tell the party to pull together behind the presumptive nominee.  He is going to free his delegates to go to McCain.  This is not something that a suspended campaign does.  It is what an ended campaign does. 

I find this particularly disturbing in that Romney had many problems with McCain when they were opponents.  Is it necessary to endorse someone that you have already told the public that you don’t agree with?  Is it necessary to back someone with him you disagree?  Could Romney not just ask that his delegates be freed from their allegiance to him?

Whether I agree with Romney’s endorsement or not, I do agree that the GOP needs to rally behind one candidate and not have a conservative break when that candidate is not a true conservative.


Another Suspension of a Presidential Nominee Campaign?

I am amazed it took Mitt Romney this long.  He is a businessman so he had to have realized long ago that his investment in his campaign for the GOP presidential nomination was not a good investment.

CNN is now reporting that today, at CPAC 2008, Mitt Romney will announce that he is suspending his campaign for the GOP presidential nomination.  This is still in the unconfirmed stages but is, in my mind, truly believeable.

Romney offered the GOP faithful a person who campaigned on heavy conservative principles.  Yes, he was late coming to the party but he came.  He is solidly in the conservative corner. 

Romney offered the GOP faithful a person who had unbelieveable business credentials.  His executive experience is not to be matched by candidates in either party.  This aspect of Romney may have been the undoing of his campaign as Romney could look at the hard figures and do the analysis himself.  He knew what was ahead and that the money for such a climb, and ultimately when looking on past support, the support was not there either.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,870 other followers