Daily Archives: 2 June 2009

Teaching to the Test

There has always been debate within many communities that linking teacher pay to student assessments – generally speaking, standardized tests – is a flawed assessment for the teacher.  I am beginning to truly believe this to be the case.

NYS recently released state math assessment scores for grades 3-8.  While NYS implemented statewide assessments in certain grades prior to NCLB, the testing every year is a result of NCLB.  Local education reporter George Basler discussed the most recent results with Dawn Shannon, assistant superintendent for educational support and technology at Broome-Tioga BOCES.

My concerns come when Shannon says “// schools have modified curricula and instruction and “drilled deeper” into data to analyze areas where students need improvement.”  To me, this statement means that schools have modified curricula to meet what the test.  This is basically a fancy way of saying we “teach to the test.”

So as to not think that this is just in younger grades, let me tell you about a high school situation.  My son is a freshman in high school here locally.  High school math is again undergoing a massive state revamp.  When I went to high school – eons ago, I swear, since my 30th reunion is this summer, math was algebra, geometry, trigonometry and pre-calculus or calculus.  Suddenly, as my oldest began high school, math was Math I, Math II, Math III, Math IV and local or AP calculus after that.  Somewhere around 2000, State Ed decided Math A and Math B would be implemented.  The problems with Math A and B were that the curriculum for the courses was too long for one school year.  So, lo and behold, NYS is going back  to algebra, geometry, trigonometry.

My 14 year old took integrated algebra last year and a Regents exam in such.  This year, in ninth grade, he has taken geometry.  One would logically think that he would take the geometry regents exam on June 16th.  No.  In the infinite wisdom of my school district – or of its high school math department, this is the first year of the geometry regents.  Historically, first year regents as math has changed are horribly difficult and not a fair measure of the student’s knowledge.  So, my son will take a local final this year as opposed to the geometry regents.  One reason that I am sure played into this decision is that there are no regents to see how the test will be.  Consequently, no one can teach to the test but has to teach the subject matter.


NY’s Expanded Bottle Bill

Last fall, Governor David A Paterson of New York began talking about a new, bigger, better bottle bill in NYS.  The original NY bottle bill has been in effect about 25 years and is only on beer and soda bottles and cans.  This bill was an environmental victory as the funds from the bottles and cans that were not returned were applied to environmental causes in the state.

The new, bigger and better bottle bill that Gov Paterson started with was flawed in so many ways.  First, Paterson wanted to put additional requirements on the water bottle industry.  He wanted a special NY bar code to be put on the water bottles.  I fail to see why this is necessary.  Not only does add an additional expense for producers, it seems unreasonable that any item in this day and age should be labeled for solely NY sale.

The second major flaw in my mind, and again in my mind the most important issue, was that the monies from bottles that were not returned for the deposit were to go into the NYS general fund.  I admit I am sick of increased taxes in NY.  I admit that there is a huge deficit looming in NY due to less collection of taxes from large Wall Street firms.  I will not, though, admit that monies that could be kept for expanding alternative energies or other environmental items and needs should just automatically go into the state’s general fund.

Despite the second concern, the bigger, better bottle bill passed and approximately $118 million was put in the NYS budget for fiscal year 2009-2010 from such a bill, the monies going into the general fund.  The bill was set to take effect on June 1, 2009.  April came and went.  There was give and take over monies for stores that were going to have to be prepared for the huge additional influx of returns.  There was questions as to whether the state would be ready.  State legislators toyed with additional legislation in May to push back the start date to July, August or later.

The last week of May brought a preliminary injunction from US District Court Judge Thomas Griesa that the additional bottle deposit could not go into effect on June 1, 2009.  Today, June 2, 2009, an additional court order from Judge Griesa states that the bigger, better bottle bill cannot be implemented until June 1, 2010.  In his court order, Griesa indicated that NYS only bar codes are not constitutional.

Now comes the bigger problem with the bigger, better bottle bill.  I am sure you think there is no problem left.  There  is a year to get it right.  Unfortunately, NYS has a huge problem – a budget gap of $118 million – that will only be able to be taken care of through additional cuts to state spending (something I do not feel that the legislature and governor did enough in the current budget).


Obama’s Possible Army Secretary

Many of my diehard Republican friends were very disappointed with the results of last November’s election.  They were, though, happy to hear that President Obama would keep Secretary Gates on as Secretary of Defense.  Now, Obama is busy filling those “lesser” positions.

The most recent rumor – being reported by NPR here – is that Obama may possibly name Congressman John McHugh as Secretary of the Army.  Why does this surprise anyone?  This type of an appointment is political strategy at its best.  New York’s congressional delegation has only three Republicans in it.  McHugh, one of those three, was re-elected in November with over 65% of the vote in his upstate district.  He has been in the House of Representatives for 17 years and is the ranking member on the Armed Services committee.

So, why is this strategic?  First, Obama is banking on being able to get a Democrat elected to replace McHugh in a special election for the NY-23rd.  The NY-23rd is a huge district, covering most of upstate NY and being over 14,000 square miles in size.  Obama has already proven that he can get Democrats elected in NYS by helping virtual unknown Scott Murphy to win a special election for the congressional seat vacated by Kirsten Gillibrand upon her appointment to the US Senate.

By chipping away at the three GOP members in the NY congressional delegation, Obama will create a force to be reckoned with within NYS, possibly strengthening the chances of a democratic governor being elected in 2010.  The current Democrat in the governor’s office – David Paterson – was not elected but took over from Eliot Spitzer in March of 2008 and has an extremely low approval rating with NYS voters.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,000 other followers