Daily Archives: 3 October 2008

The One and Only Vice Presidential Debate – Part II

Not to try and leave off where I did but below you will find additional topics covered last night in the vice presidential debate.  I have tried hard to not listen to or read very much on the debate today so these are my thoughts.

Climate Change Causes – This topic is a tie.  Sarah Palin said that Alaska sees more climate change and its effects than other states.  Not all of the changes are caused by the activity of man.  Some changes are due to the cyclical nature of climate.  She also stated she didn’t want to argue about the cause but about fixing it.  Evidently, this is a strategy both houses of Congress can understand since it is basically what they did with the bailout – oh, I mean rescue – bill.  She stated that she made a position dealing with climate change a sub-cabinet position as governor.  She also spoke to the importance of alternative energies.  Joe Biden stated flat out that climate changes were manmade.  Having studied environmental sciences in college – albeit many years ago, there is something to cyclical changes but manmade impacts have made these cyclical changes harsher.  Biden also said if you don’t understand the cause, you can’t come up with a solution.  I go back to the recent votes in both houses of Congress on this one.  Did they just drop $820,000,000,000 without finding out the root of the problem?  Biden discussed clean coal at length and said we should export the technology to prevent dirty coal from China polluting our Western coast.  He also noted that John McCain voted twenty times against bills with alternative energy sources in them and indicated that McCain was “drill, drill, drill.”  Palin rebutted with “the chant is drill, baby, drill.” but that she was in favor of the McCain all of the above approach to energy, not just drilling.  Biden was rebutting when he was cut off by Gwen Ifill, the moderator, as the time for this topic was over.  The reason I called this topic a tie is because I don’t believe either was speaking for the top of the ticket who will have the real policy ability.

Same Sex Benefits – This topic, at least as far as moderate, undecided Democrats and independents are concerned, goes to Palin.  Biden stated the response by saying there would be no distinctions between same sex couples and opposite sex couples.  He said there cannot be constitutionally.  He brought up equality in visitation rights at hospitals, property ownership.  He even mentioned the word marriage.  Palin agreed that a McCain-Palin administration would not discriminate against same sex couples for hospital visitations, property ownership, benefits.  She did make sure, though, that this was not the same thing as same sex marriage which does not exist.  Marriage is traditional and between a man and a woman according to Palin.  I think the agreement to same sex benefits will say a few  undecideds.  Since a definition of marriage is a matter for the states, not the federal government, she may be safe here and tipped the topic her way as it was new material as far as I can find.

Iraq – Please realize that Ifill pointed out that both either have a son in Iraq or on his way to Iraq.  I have to give this area to Biden.  Neither candidate did much more than tow the party line.  Palin said that she and McCain have a good plan.  She attempted to attack Biden on the fact that he called his running mate, Obama, out on his votes against funding.  She stressed that we cannot afford early withdrawal.  She said we were down to pre-surge number now which is incorrect.  Biden said that we should set up a timeline of 16 months to get all of our troops out of Iraq.  We can use this time to shift responsibilities to Iraqi security.  Biden also pointed out that McCain voted against funding at one point in time as it had a timeline attached.  We MUST have a time line according to the Obama-Biden ticket.  Iraq must spend its own money also.  Palin rebutted that the Obama-Biden plan was the white flag of surrender as we are getting closer to victory.  Biden reiterated that McCain voted against funding because he didn’t want a timeline.  Biden also stated that McCain was dead wrong about the fundamentals of the war from the beginning.

On which is more dangerous:  a nuclear Iran or an unstable Pakistan – I place this one in Biden’s camp too, though only by a small margin.  Biden plainly stated that both are a threat.  Pakistan already has nuclear weapons.  Iran is not close to a deployable nuclear weapon.  He also asserted that John McCain continues to tell us that the home of terrorism is Iraq.  This is not a statement I have ever heard and I listen to a lot of politics.  Sarah Palin called Iranian president Ahmadinejad not sane or stable.  She lumped him in with Kim Jong Il and the Castro brothers as those who are downright dangerous.  She also asserted that Barack Obama would meet with leaders like this without preconditions.  Palin sort of ignored the part the Pakistani portion of the question, hence the topic going to Biden.

Former Secretaries of State have encouraged diplomacy – This topic was basically a follow up from Ifill that deals with Iran and Pakistan and also other countries mentioned by Palin in the previous topic area.  Palin agreed that we must have this but not on the presidential level which is what Obama has said he would do.  Diplomacy with countries such as Iran and North Korea is hard work by serious people.  Biden says Obama didn’t say anything about sitting down with Ahmadinejad but our allies want us to sit down.  No one is as bad as John McCain who said a few weeks ago that he would not even sit down with the government of Spain – a NATO ally.  Palin did not even rebut this claim but went on to talk about Israel and a two state solution.  She asserted that Secretary Rice is still trying.  Biden responded with no one is a better friend to Israel than Joe Biden, which means if you are playing the “official” vice presidential debate drinking game you get a few beers as he referred to himself in the third person.

I am beginning to understand why I kept thinking, last night, that hte debate was way too long.  I have pages more of notes and cannot continue.  Reliving it is living in the past – and whether I learn from my mistakes as Palin assured the American people that a McCain-Palin administration would do from Bush mistakes or whether my past is a prologue to my future as Biden asserted in talking about foreign policy – and I need to get on with the present and future.  I may give you all a third installment or I may go out, seeing it is Friday and all.


Fall …

This blog entry has been floating around in my head for a few days.  I would toy with talking it through into my mp3 player, which also has a voice recorder, as I ran because that is when the difference in seasons really hits me.  The colors are so vibrant.  The breeze is stiffer and cooler.  It is coming from a totally different direction.  And, yesterday, the clouds looked more like snow clouds than rain clouds.  Autumn is here.

To that end, I start my fall cleaning.  I know most people have spring cleaning.  The ability to open the windows and air out the stale inside air of the winter helps motivate spring cleaning.  I, though, am an outdoorsy type person.  I am outside as much in fall and winter as I am in spring and summer.  So I clean to help sweep away everything that I missed that was tracked in during the summer months of open windows and open doors.

So to welcome fall to my home, I am changing my table cloth.  I am changing my water goblets – yes, they are plastic but I don’t care.  I am changing my menu as food is different in the fall from in the summer.  I am changing my centerpiece on my table – from a basket of peaches and melons to a basket of apples.  I am changing my candles I burn to cranberry apple and pumpkin spice.  I am changing my routine – from running in the early morning to running in the late morning or afternoon, from having only coffee as a hot drink in the morning to having coffee and a pot of tea.

Happy Fall!


The One and Only Vice Presidential Debate

The hype around the debate last night was more interesting, in my mind, than the actual debate.  Yes, in many ways, it was historical with Sarah Palin being the first woman to be nominated as her party’s vice presidential candidate.  Yes, there was a black woman as moderator.  I didn’t think either of these items was worthy of the print it got from the Associated Press.

There was the pre-debate questions surrounding Gwen Ifill as the moderator.  Ifill is scheduled to release a book on January 20, 2009 that is entitled:  The Breakthrough:  Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.  The McCain campaign said they did not know this when Ifill was approved by both campaigns as moderator of this debate.  That may well be and it may be that, in the interest of full disclosure, Ifill should have told the Commission on Presidential Debates that the book was coming out.  I have to say that I never doubted for a minute that Ifill would be a professional.  I was not happy with her reactions to Sarah Palin’s convention speech but we all slip up occasionally.  Ifill had had her slip up and was definitely professional.  I did not, for a minute, think that the questions last evening favored one candidate and the top of that ticket over another.  I did, though, worry as Ifill did her opening statement as she was very formal in introducing Palin but did not even put a title in front of Joe Biden the first time she mentioned his name.  The worry was unnecessary.

I found Palin asking permission to call Biden Joe as they were greeting each other a huge mistake.  The mic was on and everyone heard it.  It could play one of two ways.  First, he is old enough to be her father and she felt that he deserved the chance to allow her to call him by his first name.  The other way was an unsureness, an insecurity.  If you are in the business world, you call your peers by first name.  You don’t need to ask permission.

On the issues, I rate them in the manner below.

Bailout Bill – ooops, rescue bill – This topic went to Biden.  He was there to vote.  He could site campaign line on it.  Palin did better to connect to the average voter when discussing this topic.  She could have done more to point out what the ticket wanted to do to fix it, maybe even pointing out the imperfections in what did pass the Senate.

Vice President bridging the gap of polarization in the Senate – This one goes to Palin.  Biden pointed out that he has done this his whole career.  He then took on the comments made by John McCain about the fundamentals of the economy being sound.  Please look below for some additional Biden comments.  Palin not only defended McCain.  She did so with spirit and pointed out that Barack Obama was a party line voter 96% of the time since coming to the Senate.

It was during this exchange over polarization that I decided Biden was being condescending.  He was not making eye contact with the camera.  During rebuttal time, he was talking to Ifill, not Palin.  Palin looked right at Biden as she went to defend McCain’s statement.  She looked directly into the camera and spoke to the voters in the auditorium and watching on television.  Biden did not do this as well.

Subprime Lending Mess and Fault  - This topic went to Palin, because of what she said but could easily have been a tie because of what she did not say.  Palin connected with the people on this.  She talked about predatory lenders, deception, greed and corruption on Wall Street.  Her biggest points of the night, in my mind as I have been looking for a politician to say something along these lines, came when she discussed personal responsibility, how we as individuals and Americans have to take some responsibility for what has happened and for learning lessons from it.  Biden pointed out that two years ago his running mate warned of the subprime mortgage mess, whereas McCain was always for cutting regulations.  Biden took this into health care briefly, saying McCain would also like to do the same deregulation to that area of your life.  Palin rebutted with talking points about tax relief and government becoming more efficient and doing with less as the people are.  She should have come back with bits about how Obama had to know what was coming with subprime mortgages as he had, as a community organizer, sued Citibank under the Community Reinvestment Act in 1994 to force the bank to make bad loans.  He did this as a partner with ACORN

During the exchange after this questions initial response, Ifill cut off Palin, saying time was up.  Of course, Ifill had learned from Jim Lehrer that she had to do this if she wanted to get in more questions than he did.  I was concerned that she was doing so with Palin but she also cut off Biden later in the debate so was well within her rights as moderator to do so.    

Class Warfare – This issue was a tie.  Biden said it is called fairness in his part of the world to give the lower and the middle classes a break and tax the wealthy more.  The reason for a tie here is a statement Biden made that I will have to look into more.  He did not just reiterate the ticket’s line of 95% of people would see tax relief.  He said 95% of those making less than $150,000 would see relief.  This is different from what Obama says daily.  He also said that the wealthy would pay no more in taxes than they did under Ronald Reagan.  Usually, Obama says that the wealthy would pay no more than under Clinton.  Palin stated that the $250,000 threshold would hurt millions of small business owners, thereby hurting job creation and the economy.  She also discussed the McCain health care plan here and that is it budget neutral.  Biden actually sounded condescending as he started his rebuttal – saying he didn’t know where to start.  He said he, and those in his neighborhood and the neighborhoods he grew up in, don’t call a redistribution of wealth and taxes fairness.  He also stated that 95% of small business owners make less than $250,000.  I am not sure if he realizes what a business owner makes is not the same as what he pays taxes on.  He, then, went on to say that the McCain health care plan was going to ultimately cost the health care consumer money and was the “ultimate bridge to nowhere.”

What promises can the ticket not keep that are being made – This issue goes to Biden, not because he actually answered but because he used the topic better.  He spoke of items that the campaign is promising and which would be slowed in implementation and which would not, could not be slowed.  Palin ignored the question.  I was totally dismayed that she would mention that she has only been at this five weeks.  That is not an excuse.  Not that I want to defend Joe Biden, but as a vice presidential candidate, he has only been at this thing six weeks.  Palin needs to get away from talking points and be herself.

Changing Bankruptcy Laws Last Year – This one is a tie.  Palin said that last year she would have supported the changes but that things have changed since last year.  Biden and Obama voted differently on this item.  Biden went back to subprime in his response and that bankruptcy judges have to have more flexibility to help consumers stay in their homes.

I think that this was about the time that Palin’s performance started to decline.  Her answers seemed to become more unfocused.  It was like the time was too long.  This is also the point in time when I started to think the debate was too long.  Neither candidate was telling me anything I was looking for regarding their ticket and I kept asking how much longer.

The debate did go on and I have about another eight pages of notes.  Unfortunately, like my lack of attention last night, I have a lack now.  There were some interesting exchanges on foreign policy and I will make a second entry on the rest of the debate as I have other obligations now.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,000 other followers